Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Max232's avatar

Hi Uzo,

Thanks for the interesting case and well-described thesis! I have a few points I wanted to share/ask:

I am disappointed Honey Birdette was not sold. I struggle to see the long-term sense in operating a mediocre business with no USP and also brings China tariff headache with it.

So keeping that means the "one remaining non-core asset to sell" is their artwork. In the Q1 2025 financials "Assets held for sale" was $3.890 million. You wrote "the proceeds from that should wipe out most of my debt" .. I struggle how this amount could significantly reduce a $175 million debt? What do I potentially overlook here?

You mentioned "$20m of overhead (plus $3m SBC)" I assume you mean per quarter, right? PLBY has roughly $100 million in SGA annually. Otherwise, the numbers don't align.

At the moment PLBY will have roughly $30 million per annum from licensing income. With SGA $100 million and annual Interest Expense ca $17 million it's clear they'll need more license deals.

Mgmt states "We are actively pursuing new licensing opportunities, particularly in land-based entertainment and gaming. This includes developing a Playboy-branded membership club in the United States, a significant focus area for us moving forward" I trust Mgmt on this, because the pace of recent deals is strong.

Finally, the recent board approval to increase authorized shares from 150 million to 400 million strikes me as quite significant. Do you expect/see dilution as a potential problem here?

Thanks again for sharing your insights!

Max

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts